{"id":1843,"date":"2021-03-22T12:01:45","date_gmt":"2021-03-22T16:01:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/contrat-toute-attente%e2%80%af-the-modification-of-contracts-during-a-pandemic\/"},"modified":"2025-04-09T17:31:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-09T21:31:25","slug":"contrat-toute-attente-the-modification-of-contracts-during-a-pandemic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/contrat-toute-attente-the-modification-of-contracts-during-a-pandemic\/","title":{"rendered":"The Modification of Contracts During a Pandemic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cContrat toute attente\u201d is a podcast series on Quebec contract law in a coronavirus world, exploring the consequences of the pandemic on contract law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this third and final episode of the series, Julie and J\u00e9r\u00e9mie explore the rules of contract modification in the context of a pandemic; talk about force majeure with Ms. \u00c9lise Th\u00e9riault (Option consommateurs); and discuss the theory of unforeseeability, as well as good faith and contractual morality with Professor Andr\u00e9 B\u00e9langer (Faculty of Law, Laval University), specifically by reviewing the legacy of the Churchill Falls decision. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cContrat toute attente\u201d is a podcast series on Quebec contract law in a coronavirus world, exploring&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":1835,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[23,132],"class_list":["post-1843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-knowledge","tag-business-law","tag-civil-law"],"acf":[],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":27,"label":"JuriKnowledge"}],"post_tag":[{"value":23,"label":"Business Law"},{"value":132,"label":"Civil Law"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/graphicstock-outline-of-handshake-of-two-businessmen-over-workplace_SHWoubjlZ-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"Patrick Walton","author_link":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/author\/patrick\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":27,"name":"JuriKnowledge","slug":"knowledge","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":27,"taxonomy":"category","description":"Video publications about legal issues, highlighting the work of legal scholars or the activities of legal practitioners.","parent":0,"count":80,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0","cat_ID":27,"category_count":80,"category_description":"Video publications about legal issues, highlighting the work of legal scholars or the activities of legal practitioners.","cat_name":"JuriKnowledge","category_nicename":"knowledge","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":23,"name":"Business Law","slug":"business-law","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":23,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":10,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"},{"term_id":132,"name":"Civil Law","slug":"civil-law","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":132,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":16,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1843"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1843\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1835"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}