{"id":1735,"date":"2021-03-08T19:59:29","date_gmt":"2021-03-09T00:59:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/navigating-contracts-in-pandemic-times\/"},"modified":"2025-04-09T17:32:53","modified_gmt":"2025-04-09T21:32:53","slug":"navigating-contracts-in-pandemic-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/navigating-contracts-in-pandemic-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Navigating Contracts in Pandemic Times"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>\u201cContrat toute attente\u201d is a podcast series on Quebec contract law in a coronavirus world, exploring the consequences of the pandemic on contract law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> In this first episode, Professors Julie Paquin and J\u00e9r\u00e9mie Torres-Ceyte discuss the impact of the pandemic on the enforcement of contracts. The researchers consider whether the pandemic constitutes a force majeure and discuss the contract implications for travellers whose flights have been cancelled due to COVID-19 with Ms. \u00c9lise Th\u00e9riault (Option consommateurs), Ms. C\u00e9line Ruault (Vol en retard) and Professor David Robitaille (Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa). <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More episodes will become available on Jurivision shortly. Stay tuned! <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cContrat toute attente\u201d is a podcast series on Quebec contract law in a coronavirus world, exploring&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1729,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_kad_blocks_custom_css":"","_kad_blocks_head_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_body_custom_js":"","_kad_blocks_footer_custom_js":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_kad_post_transparent":"","_kad_post_title":"","_kad_post_layout":"","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[27],"tags":[132,25,70],"class_list":["post-1735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-knowledge","tag-civil-law","tag-constitutional-law","tag-interdisciplinarity"],"acf":[],"taxonomy_info":{"category":[{"value":27,"label":"JuriKnowledge"}],"post_tag":[{"value":132,"label":"Civil Law"},{"value":25,"label":"Constitutional Law"},{"value":70,"label":"Interdisciplinarity"}]},"featured_image_src_large":["https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/post-podcast01-1024x576.jpg",1024,576,true],"author_info":{"display_name":"\u00c9tienne Trepanier","author_link":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/author\/etienne\/"},"comment_info":0,"category_info":[{"term_id":27,"name":"JuriKnowledge","slug":"knowledge","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":27,"taxonomy":"category","description":"Video publications about legal issues, highlighting the work of legal scholars or the activities of legal practitioners.","parent":0,"count":80,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0","cat_ID":27,"category_count":80,"category_description":"Video publications about legal issues, highlighting the work of legal scholars or the activities of legal practitioners.","cat_name":"JuriKnowledge","category_nicename":"knowledge","category_parent":0}],"tag_info":[{"term_id":132,"name":"Civil Law","slug":"civil-law","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":132,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":16,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"},{"term_id":25,"name":"Constitutional Law","slug":"constitutional-law","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":25,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":11,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"},{"term_id":70,"name":"Interdisciplinarity","slug":"interdisciplinarity","term_group":0,"term_taxonomy_id":70,"taxonomy":"post_tag","description":"","parent":0,"count":8,"filter":"raw","term_order":"0"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1735\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1729"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jurivision.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}